Ethical Decision Making in the Work Place – Part 3

Sometimes emotion and ego get in the way of changing the unrewarding decision and course we are traveling and we keep right on trucking and digging a deeper hole. We kind of “cut off our nose to spite our face.”

There are those who rationalize poor behavior as to why it wasn’t their fault. Examples of this is the firefighter who fails a promotional exam then blames the exam maker, or the department has it out for him/her, or the exam was developed for a favorite child. How about the lazy firefighter who comes to work to rest or to just do the bare minimum? He/she rationalizes this behavior in his/her own mind and lets us all know about it. Most of us will just listen and not challenge the unacceptable rational of the complaining firefighter. People of character will not let this rationalization slide. Organizations of character would also not let this behavior go unnoticed.

This is such a vital point. Everywhere we see evidence that we’re becoming a nation of unaccountable victims, whiners, and wimps all too ready to pass off responsibility to someone else.

Satirist Ambrose Bierce poked fun at this tendency when he defined responsibility as “a detachable burden easily shifted to the shoulders of God, Fate, Fortune, Luck, or one’s neighbor.” The parade of recently indicted CEO’s added a new object of blame to this list (“It was the people who worked for me!”) as they claimed to be victims rather than perpetrators of frauds that enriched them.

Everywhere we turn, we see people blaming personal shortcomings and social ills on circumstances beyond their control or on an irresponsible media, greedy businessmen, corrupt politicians, irresistible economic pressures, and every manner of psychological syndrome. Yes, and even poor fire department leadership.

The bottom line is each of us can be as ethical with our decisions as we are willing to be. We need to think about our decisions in terms of simply right or wrong, how it impacts relationships, our credibility and our reputation.

Scenario:
You are a captain working overtime at a slow station. You are not familiar with the district and would like to take a drive around the area. Your senior engineer is not happy with your decision to drive around the district and is very willing to let you and the other crew members know about his unhappiness.

You decide to go anyway. During your drive the engineer embarks on a never ending dialog regarding the past, recent, and continuing mistakes the department administration has made. His dislike for his battalion chief and most chief officers is obvious. He informs you that he has taken a couple of promotional exams for the captain’s position and has not done well. He blames this failure on anything he can think about but himself.

What would you do, if anything as the company officer, to end the engineers bitter dissertation on the ills of the department.

Let us know your thoughts.

Paul Stein

About Paul Stein

Paul H. Stein retired Chief Officer from the Santa Monica Fire Department. During his 31 year career Chief Stein has 25 years experience as a supervisor. He has served as Line Officer, Battalion Commander, Fire Marshal and Division Chief Training Officer. After retirement he spent nine months as Interim Fire Chief in Lakeside California. Chief Stein has served as the Fire Technology Coordinator at Santa Monica College, an instructor for the California Fire Academy System and former Adjunct Faculty Member for the National Fire Academy. He holds an AS Degree in Fire Technology and a BA Degree in Management. Chief Stein is a Master Instructor for the California Department of Education.